Abstract
This paper aims to address two distinct, but related, questions about the emergence of a pluralist politico-legal order in the last decade of the last century in Ethiopia. The first question has to do with why the Ethiopian state, as opposed to the society, remained unitarist, as opposed to pluralist, for most of its history, despite its mosaic diversity and what prompted the adoption of ethnic federalism? The aim of this short essay is thus to throw light on why it remained unitarist for most of its history, how political history conspired with legal history in the making of a unitarist politico-legal order, and what prompted the emergence of a pluralist politico-legal order recently. This I shall do by telling two distinct, but not unrelated, accounts regarding Ethiopia’s politics and law with a focus on the center-periphery cleavage. In so doing, the political history of Ethiopia will be analyzed through the evolution of the center-periphery cleavage.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
