Abstract

The calling behaviour of Paridae species (i.e. titmice, tits and chickadees) in a predator-related context is well-studied. Parid species are known to alter call types, note composition or call duration according to predation risk. However, how these species encode information about a non-threatening context, such as food sources, has been subject to only few studies. Studies in Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) have shown that this species alters the ratio of C and D notes to encode information about the presence of food and/or the flight behaviour of the signaller. This suggests that parids also use graded signals to encode information about non-predatory contexts. No study to date has directly compared the calls of a feeding context with those of a predation (i.e. mobbing) context. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare the calling behaviour of these two situations in great tits (Parus major). Calls uttered at a feeder were recorded, analysed and compared with calls uttered in front of taxidermy mounts of sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus). In the food context, great tits reduced the number of D notes and increased the number of B, C and E notes compared with the mobbing context. Furthermore, tits produced calls with longer D notes and shorter intervals between D notes than in the mobbing context. This indicates that great tits use two mechanisms of graded signals (i.e. note type and acoustic structure of D calls) to inform conspecifics about the nature of a situation.

Highlights

  • There is a growing body of research about if and how animals use vocalizations to encode information about their environment

  • Great tits are monogamous birds living in pairs during the breeding season, but form flocks consisting of adults and non-related juveniles of both sexes during the non-breeding season [54,55]

  • We found a significant difference between calls of a food-associated and mobbing context

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a growing body of research about if and how animals use vocalizations to encode information about their environment (reviewed in [1]). Even if calling might hold costs, transmitting information about the environment to con- and heterospecifics can increase the (long-term) fitness of the caller. Referential calls are discrete calls and transmit information about an event (e.g. predation) or object (e.g. food) and thereby enable the receiver to show an appropriate behavioural response without any additional cues [10]. Fledglings [17] and adults [19,20] show different anti-predator behaviours after hearing such calls. Some species, such as the domestic chicken use referential calls in a food-associated context [21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.