Abstract

A 20-year investigation commenced at the inception of the Great Slave Lake commercial fishery, and it is inferred that exploitation has been the sole cause of change in the fish stocks. Background information on the operation of the commercial fishery, the fishing regulations, and the study methods are provided. Lake whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis, and lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush, have made up 94% of the commercial landings of 119 million lb during the period. Only three other species of the 25 occurring in the lake were usually marketed. Whitefish catches generally were distributed equally between the summer and winter seasons. Trout were caught almost exclusively during the summer season. The annual catch of these two species rose from 1.6 million lb in 1945 to a maximum of 9.4 million lb in 1949 then gradually decreased to about the 5 million lb level. The study data have been partitioned according to 13 statistical areas. Catch has not been in proportion to the extent of these areas. Whitefish catch has predominated in the western, Interior Lowlands, portion of the lake while trout catch has predominated in the eastern, Canadian Shield, portion. In various areas, the peak catches for whitefish were associated with peak catches for trout, indicating that both were the result of fishing down the virgin stocks. Summer catch per unit effort for each species has declined during the 20-year period. CPE varied with the statistical areas. The usual observed reduction for whitefish was 60% in contrast to 93% for trout. Estimated summer fishing effort and whitefish catch showed a direct relation but the relation for trout usually changed from a positive to a negative one. The average size of commercially caught fish has declined to about 2 lb for whitefish and 5 lb for trout. Information on catch per unit effort for other species indicates no evident explosions in their numbers, though ciscoes, Leucichthys spp., appear to have increased in abundance. Although the fishery was regulated in order to provide for maximum annual sustained yields, this has not been achieved for trout. Three opinions for this are offered. Exploitation under a pooled quota system for whitefish and trout is not favoured and a decrease in trout quota is recommended.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.