Grazing by a native and an exotic crayfish on aquatic macrophytes

Abstract

1. We compared grazing by native noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and the exotic signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) on seedling or well‐established macrophytes.2. In a pool experiment, seedlings of emergent Scirpuslacustris and floating‐leaved Potamogetonnatans were heavily grazed by adult signal crayfish, whereas established plants of the same species sustained only minor damage.3. In a preference experiment two submerged macrophytes (Charavulgaris and Elodeacanadensis), and both seedlings and established plants of S. lacustris and P. natans, were presented pairwise to signal and noble crayfish. There was no significant difference in preference by the two crayfish species. Chara vulgaris was preferred to all other plants presented, established plants of S. lacustris and P. natans were never preferred, and seedlings of P. natans were preferred to established P. natans.4. An aquarium experiment was conducted in which the consumption of Chara by signal and noble crayfish was measured in relation to water temperature. Signal crayfish consumed significantly more Chara than noble crayfish, especially at higher temperatures.5. Our results indicate that the signal crayfish is the more voracious grazer especially at higher temperatures. There may be negative effects on vegetation (emergents and floating‐leaved, as well as submerged species) when the signal crayfish is introduced. Chara species are particularly susceptible, since they are preferred by crayfish and the genus includes a large number of rare species. Stocking of crayfish therefore could lead to the decline or removal of submerged species in order of crayfish feeding preferences and could prevent the spread or cause a decline of emergent and floating‐leaved vegetation.