Abstract

Camouflage may promote fitness of given phenotypes in different environments. The tawny owl (Strix aluco) is a color polymorphic species with a gray and brown morph resident in the Western Palearctic. A strong selection pressure against the brown morph during snowy and cold winters has been documented earlier, but the selection mechanisms remain unresolved. Here, we hypothesize that selection favors the gray morph because it is better camouflaged against predators and mobbers in snowy conditions compared to the brown one. We conducted an online citizen science experiment where volunteers were asked to locate a gray or a brown tawny owl specimen from pictures taken in snowy and snowless landscapes. Our results show that the gray morph in snowy landscapes is the hardest to detect whereas the brown morph in snowy landscapes is the easiest to detect. With an avian vision model, we show that, similar to human perceivers, the brown morph is more conspicuous than the gray against coniferous tree trunks for a mobbing passerine. We suggest that with better camouflage, the gray morph may avoid mobbers and predators more efficiently than the brown morph and thus survive better in snowy environments. As winters are getting milder and shorter in the species range, the selection periods against brown coloration may eventually disappear or shift poleward.

Highlights

  • Predation is one of the most common selection pressures shaping the evolution of animal coloration (Gray & McKinnon, 2007; Nokelainen, Valkonen, Lindstedt, & Mappes, 2014; Punzalan, Rodd, & Hughes, 2005; Willmott, Robinson Willmott, Elias, & Jiggins, 2017)

  • Our results suggest that the gray tawny owl morph could benefit from its coloration via increased crypsis in snowy landscapes

  • In line with our prediction, the detection probability is lower and detection time is longer for a gray than for a brown tawny owl morph in snowy landscapes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predation is one of the most common selection pressures shaping the evolution of animal coloration (Gray & McKinnon, 2007; Nokelainen, Valkonen, Lindstedt, & Mappes, 2014; Punzalan, Rodd, & Hughes, 2005; Willmott, Robinson Willmott, Elias, & Jiggins, 2017). Spatial and temporal variation in visual environments (e.g., darkness of the background) can lead to the evolution of color polymorphisms, that is, the coexistence of genetically different color morphs within a population (Bond & Kamil, 2006; Cook, 2000; Fisher, 1958; Ford, 1945; Roulin, 2004). Color polymorphism can persist in a population if, for example, color morphs have different selective advantages in different environments (Cook, 2000) or predators develop search image for the most common morph, leading to apostatic selection (Bond & Kamil, 2006). Back Facial disk White patches on the face Dark stripes on the back. Differences in JNDs between morphs and backgrounds are highlighted in bold

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.