Gravity interpretation of the Egersund anorthosite complex, Norway: Its petrological and geothermal significance

Abstract

Research Article| February 01, 1979 Gravity interpretation of the Egersund anorthosite complex, Norway: Its petrological and geothermal significance SCOTT B. SMITHSON; SCOTT B. SMITHSON 1Department of Geology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar IVAR B. RAMBERG IVAR B. RAMBERG 2Institute for Geology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information SCOTT B. SMITHSON 1Department of Geology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 IVAR B. RAMBERG 2Institute for Geology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Publisher: Geological Society of America First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (1979) 90 (2): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1979)90<199:GIOTEA>2.0.CO;2 Article history First Online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation SCOTT B. SMITHSON, IVAR B. RAMBERG; Gravity interpretation of the Egersund anorthosite complex, Norway: Its petrological and geothermal significance. GSA Bulletin 1979;; 90 (2): 199–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1979)90<199:GIOTEA>2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The Egersund anorthosite complex consists of several bodies of anorthosite and a large syncline of layered norite and anorthosite with granitic rocks in the core. This igneous complex is emplaced in granulite-facies gneisses. These gneisses have a mean density of 2.70 g/cm3, indicative of granitic rocks. A Bouguer gravity anomaly map shows no distinctive gravity anomaly over anorthosite, but a sharp 25-mgal positive anomaly is present over the norite syncline. Gravity models indicate that the norite syncline is about 4 km thick and that relatively minor amounts of granitic gneiss are present in the core of the syncline. Anorthosite masses cannot be modeled directly but can be inferred to have a thickness of at least 4 km. Relative amounts of the rock types in the anorthosite complex are anorthosite, 70%; norite, 25%; and granitic rocks, 5%. No evidence is found for a dense mafic residuum that would be formed if the anorthosite differentiated from a basaltic magma in place. If the rocks of the complex are cogenetic, the parent magma would be noritic anorthosite, and the volume of granitic rocks is so small that it would not change the presumed composition of the parent magma appreciably. Heat flow through the anorthosite is so low (0.45 HFU) that mantle heat flow in this area can hardly be greater than 0.2 to 0.3 HFU. Granulitic gneisses or other rocks produced at low heat must compose the entire crust beneath the anorthosite complex. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.