Abstract

Understanding the control of gene expression remains one of the main challenges in the post-genomic era. Accordingly, a plethora of methods exists to identify variations in gene expression levels. These variations underlay almost all relevant biological phenomena, including disease and adaptation to environmental conditions. However, computational tools to identify how regulation changes are scarce. Regulation of gene expression is usually depicted in the form of a gene regulatory network (GRN). Structural changes in a GRN over time and conditions represent variations in the regulation of gene expression. Like other biological networks, GRNs are composed of basic building blocks called graphlets. As a consequence, two new metrics based on graphlets are proposed in this work: REConstruction Rate (REC) and REC Graphlet Degree (RGD). REC determines the rate of graphlet similarity between different states of a network and RGD identifies the subset of nodes with the highest topological variation. In other words, RGD discerns how th GRN was rewired. REC and RGD were used to compare the local structure of nodes in condition-specific GRNs obtained from gene expression data of Escherichia coli, forming biofilms and cultured in suspension. According to our results, most of the network local structure remains unaltered in the two compared conditions. Nevertheless, changes reported by RGD necessarily imply that a different cohort of regulators (i.e. transcription factors (TFs)) appear on the scene, shedding light on how the regulation of gene expression occurs when E. coli transits from suspension to biofilm. Consequently, we propose that both metrics REC and RGD should be adopted as a quantitative approach to conduct differential analyses of GRNs. A tool that implements both metrics is available as an on-line web server (http://dlab.cl/loto).

Highlights

  • Networks are everywhere [1]

  • The occurrence of each type of graphlets and the number of genes not forming any graphlet (NOG) in each condition specific gene regulatory network (GRN) is shown in S2 Table

  • It is worth noting that the fraction of nodes that participate in any graphlet remained almost invariable in all the networks, demonstrating that graphlet-based metrics do consider most of the nodes in GRNs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Networks are everywhere [1]. They are used to represent complex data associations from different domains ranging from social interactions and technological developments up to PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163497 October 3, 2016Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencias de Valparaiso (CINV) [ICM-Economia P09-022-F] (http://www.iniciativamilenio.cl/). Networks are everywhere [1]. They are used to represent complex data associations from different domains ranging from social interactions and technological developments up to PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163497. DSH acknowledges economical support to Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico project [1130683] (FONDECYT http:// www.conicyt.cl/fondecyt/).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.