Abstract
AbstractPlots of crystal size distribution of the following crystallizer models are compared: an ideal continuous‐flow MSMPR (mixed suspension, mixed product removal) crystallizer with a zero as well as non‐zero initial crystal size, an MSMPR crystallizer with size dependent growth of crystals, an MSMPR crystallizer with missing fines, an MSMPR crystallizer with agglomerative growth, and a series of MSMPR crystallizers simulating a crystallizer with nonideal agitation. The shape of the individual size distribution curves can serve as a diagnostic criterion in determination of the most probable model of crystallization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
