Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper offers an accessible discussion of graphical causal models and how such a framework can be used to help identify causal relations. A graphical causal model represents a researcher’s qualitative assumptions. As a result of the credibility revolution, there is growing interest to properly estimate cause-and-effect relationships. Using several examples, we illustrate how graphical models can and cannot be used to identify causation from observational data. Further, we offer a replication of a previous study that explored college enrolment by high school seniors who were eligible for student aid. From the original study, we use a graphical causal model to motivate the quantitative and qualitative modelling assumptions. Using a similar difference-in-difference approach based on propensity score matching, we estimate a smaller average treatment effect than the original study. The smaller estimated effect arguably stems from the graphical causal model’s delineation of the original model specification.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call