Abstract

Because of the present deep impact of information technology on society, school subjects that deal with topics of computer science or digital literacy gain importance nowadays. Some countries start to teach related topics in primary education and even in kindergarten. The underlying curricula, educational standards and/or competency models have already been developed and established and differ in a lot of points. Because of these differences, a comparison is a complex task. In this paper a graph-based approach is applied to introduce a framework for comprehensibly evaluating the different curricula, standards and competency models and to demonstrate its use by analyzing and comparing six existing curricula, standards and competency models. Our approach maps the content of curricula and standards to a directed graph by connecting their knowledge items with each other via dependency relations. This method enables a formalized comparison using graph theoretical metrics like the highest degrees, numbers of sources and sinks, or the connectivity. The representation is mapped to a graph database, allowing for further analysis of the content and preparing the ground for teachers and curriculum-developers to individually form a computer science curriculum in primary schools.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.