Abstract
Criminal investigation adopts Artificial Intelligence to enhance the volume of the facts that can be investigated and documented in trials. However, the abstract reasoning implied in legal justification and argumentation requests to adopt solutions providing high precision, low generalization error, and retrospective transparency. Three requirements that hardly coexist in today’s Artificial Intelligence solutions. In a controlled experiment, we then investigated the use of graph embeddings procedures to retrieve potential criminal actions based on patterns defined in enquiry protocols. We observed that a significant level of accuracy can be achieved but different graph reformation procedures imply different levels of precision, generalization, and transparency.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
