Abstract
Extragalactic astronomy is a relatively young science. Its birth may be set at the time of the “greatdebate”betweenHarlowShapleyandHeberCurtisontheextragalacticnatureofthenebulae(whichculminated with a meeting of the two protagonists in April 1920) or, with a more conservativestance,afewyearslateratthetimeofEdwinHubble’sdiscoveryofCepheidvariablesinMessier31,the Andromeda galaxy and the nearest spiral galaxy to our own (Hubble, 1925). In the late 1920sthe Kapteyns Universe (that posed the Sun as the center of the Milky Way) and Shapley’s view (agiantMilkyWayofwhichthespiralnebulaewerepart)hadfallenoutoffavorwiththeappreciationoftheimportanceofinterstellarmatterintheabsorptionoflight.EveniftheUniverse’sconstituentswerestarsandgas,theywerenotconfinedtoasinglegalaxy,ourowngalaxy,theMilkyWay.Inthe1950stherecalibrationoftherelationbetweenperiodandluminosityoftheCepheidstarsprovideda distance scale consistent with the one presently adopted, greatly increasing the distance of eventhe nearest spiral nebulae and settling the issue of the island universes forever (Baade, 1958).Frontiers in extragalacticastronomy—which,unlike other fields, can be literally associatedwithaphysicaldistance—haveprogressedasimprovementsininstrumentalcapabilitiesmadeitpossibleto detect and to study more and more distant objects over an ever broader range of frequencies,from the radio to the γ-ray domain. Many results on distant sources are inferred by analogy withbetter studied sources, which are usually brighter and closer. Until now this approach—which isepistemologically risky (Salmon, 2012)—has not led research into major dead ends. There havebeen fully unexpected, and less unexpected discoveries that proved to be lasting paradigm shifts.The discovery of quasars expanded the cosmic scenario to distances previously unimaginable(Schmidt, 1963). The inference of dark matter in cluster of galaxies (Zwicky, 1933), and of darkmatter influence on the rotation curve of galaxies (Rubin et al., 1980) in the early 1970s providedearly glimpses of the “dark Universe” as we understand it today. The realization of the importanceof obscuration and extinction phenomena that affect even the most powerful extragalactic sourcescamegraduallywiththedevelopmentofX-ray,spectro-polarimetricandIRinstrumentation.Otherdiscoveriesfulfilleddreamsthathadbecomereality,likethefirstplanetarytransitinfrontofaMilkyWay star that was not the Sun (Charbonneau et al., 2000). All of them enriched our view of theUniverse.Forcomprehensivereviews,thereadermayconsiderthehistoricalchaptersofD’Onofrioet al. (2012) and D’Onofrio et al. (2015) that provide first-hand accounts on major discoveries ofthe last 50 years of Galactic and extra-galactic astronomical research. The possibility of a trulyrevolutionary paradigm change was vented perhaps only once, at the time of quasars discovery(Arp, 1987). In the mid 1960s quasar distances derived from the Hubble law looked enormous,and the ensuing quasar power demanded physics that appeared exotic at the time: accretion ontoasupermassiveblackhole(Salpeter,1964;Zel’DovichandNovikov,1965).Theissuewasdefinitelysettled when astronomers could see better at larger distances. With the advent of Hubble SpaceTelescope in the early 1990s quasars were definitely confirmed as nuclei of distant galaxies asimpliedbyHubble’slaw(Bahcalletal.,1997).Activegalacticnuclei(AGN)—whichincludequasarsthat were once believed to be rare—were found to be relatively common and to play an importantrole in the evolution of galaxies (e.g., Kormendy and Ho, 2013, and references therein).
Highlights
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Padova, Italy Keywords: extragalactic astronomy, galaxies, Milky Way, active galactic nuclei, black holes, high redshift, quasars
In the mid 1960s quasar distances derived from the Hubble law looked enormous, and the ensuing quasar power demanded physics that appeared exotic at the time: accretion onto a supermassive black hole (Salpeter, 1964; Zel’Dovich and Novikov, 1965)
Active galactic nuclei (AGN)—which include quasars that were once believed to be rare—were found to be relatively common and to play an important role in the evolution of galaxies (e.g., Kormendy and Ho, 2013, and references therein). These considerations lead to the framing of three challenges in Galactic and extra-galactic astronomy that, in my opinion, can be legitimately called “grand:” the expansion of the redshift frontier, the census of galaxies and of their constituents with a full understanding of galactic evolution, and the study of accretion onto supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei, whose event horizon is literally a physical frontier of the Universe and where there is a potential for the development of new physics
Summary
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Padova, Italy Keywords: extragalactic astronomy, galaxies, Milky Way, active galactic nuclei, black holes, high redshift, quasars.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.