Abstract
In order to address complex problems, scholars are increasingly faced with challenges of integrating diverse knowledge domains. We analyzed the evolution of this convergence paradigm in the broad ecosystem of brain science, which provides a real-time testbed for evaluating two modes of cross-domain integration -- subject area exploration via expansive learning and cross-disciplinary collaboration among domain experts. Our results show that research involving both modes features a 16\% citation premium relative to a mono-disciplinary baseline. However, research utilizing cross-domain subject area exploration alone -- a convergence shortcut -- is less effective at integrating domains, markedly less impactful and yet to produce breakthroughs, despite growing faster than alternative cross-disciplinary modes. This counterproductive pattern may derive from internetization of expansive learning approaches to problem solving and the competitive pressures deriving from the current era of global flagship funding initiatives. Without additional policy support, such flagship initiates may unintentionally incentivize convergence science shortcuts that undercut the role of domain expertise in challenges calling upon convergent problem solving.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.