Abstract
Abraham Ibn Ezra considera que el estudio de la gramática hebrea es el método más importante para establecer el significado literal de una palabra o de un versículo bíblico. Podemos encontrar sus teorías gramaticales no sólo en sus obras específicas de gramática, sino también en sus comentarios bíblicos. En su Comentario a Qohelet, Ibn Ezra hace numerosas observaciones sobre la pronunciación y peculiaridades de las consonantes hebreas, la morfología de nombres y verbos, algunas estructuras sintácticas específicas y otras similares. En este artículo, se examinan estas teorías en conexión con las obras gramaticales de este autor y con las opiniones de los gramáticos anteriores, sobre todo Juda Hayyuy y Jona ibn Yanah.
Highlights
As is well-known, Abraham Ibn Ezra's Biblical commentaries train his knowledge of astronomy, astrology, philosophy, grammar, and other subjects on the interpretation of the Biblical text
We may observe that he had a great knowledge of the theories of the grammarians who preceded him, and some of his commentaries can be considered a summary of these ones. He based his theories about the morphology of the Hebrew words, especially that of the irregular verbs, in those formulated by Judah Hayyuj and Ibn Janah, and his explanations of the roots of
Abraham Ibn Ezra considers the study of the Hebrew grammar to be the most important tool for establishing the literal meaning of a word or a Biblical verse
Summary
As is well-known, Abraham Ibn Ezra's Biblical commentaries train his knowledge of astronomy, astrology, philosophy, grammar, and other subjects on the interpretation of the Biblical text. Of all these disciplines, he regards Hebrew grammar as the most important vehicle for the establishment of the meaning of a word or a verse. He regards Hebrew grammar as the most important vehicle for the establishment of the meaning of a word or a verse His commentaries are full of grammatical theories, which were further developed in his subsequent grammatical works. This article will analyze Ibn Ezra's grammatical theories in his commentary on Qohelet against the backdrop of other works and the theories of earlier grammarians '
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
