Abstract
This article examines the relationship between eighteenth-century ideologies of property rights and imperial authority in James Grainger’s The Sugar-Cane (1764). Placing Grainger into dialogue with Joshua Steele, a Barbadian planter and partial critic of existing Caribbean slavery, the article shows how Grainger’s poem seeks to articulate planters’ property rights in sweeping fashion in order to render the scope of imperial authority as expansive as possible. The fact that The Sugar-Cane is unable to fully suppress Atlantic slavery’s terrible realities registers anxieties not only about empire itself but also about the nature and meaning of property in the colonies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
