Abstract
One of the key practical challenges facing by tax reforms are their short-run welfare consequences. In this paper I focus on a consumption-based tax reform for which, despite long-run welfare gains it generates, welfare for some groups such as retirees, or the working poor, falls during transition between steady states. Using a life-cycle model with heterogeneous households, I show how to devise a transition path from the current U.S. Federal tax system to a consumption-based tax system that improves the welfare of current as well as future generations. In a nutshell, all households alive at the time of the policy change can choose when they want to switch to the new tax system, or whether they want to switch at all. I find that implementing a tax reform with this feature improves the welfare of 95% of population in the short-run, compared to less than a quarter of population in the conventional case with no choice. It takes about twenty years for half of the population to pay their taxes under the new tax code.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.