Abstract
We report a study that directly compares the comprehension skills of patients with refractory access and static storage semantic deficits. It has been reported previously, in the context of matching to sample tasks, that the performance of both types of patients may be affected by the semantic relatedness of competing responses. However, it has been hypothesised that such effects of semantic distance may reflect different processes (Warrington & Cipolotti, 1996). More specifically, semantic relatedness effects following refractory access deficits may be explained in terms of the effect of refractoriness on representations that share semantic space, whilst relatedness effects consequent to storage deficits may reflect the preferential sparing of superordinate rather than item-specific information. In this series of experiments, we compare and contrast refractory access and storage patients on word–picture matching tasks that manipulate the semantic relatedness of items within a response array. In particular, the interaction of semantic distance and item frequency is explored. We also provide evidence of gradients of semantic relatedness in our refractory assess patient, and consider what information such patients can provide about extremely fine-grain conceptual organisation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.