Abstract

AbstractThis study investigates native German speakers’ and bilingual Turkish/German speakers’ sensitivity to constraints on verbal agreement with pseudo-partitive subjects such as eine Packung Tabletten (“a pack of pills”). Although number agreement with the first noun phrase (headed by a container noun) is considered to be the norm, agreement with the second (containee) noun phrase is also possible. We combined scalar acceptability ratings with a stochastic constraint-based grammatical framework to model the relative strength of the constraints that determine speakers’ agreement preferences and subsequently tested whether these models could correctly predict speakers’ verb choices in a production task. For both participant groups, number match between the container noun phrase and the verb was the strongest determinant of both acceptability and production choices. The relative ranking of the constraints that we identified was the same for both groups, and the lack of age-of-acquisition effects suggests that constraints on variable subject–verb agreement, and their relative strength, are acquirable by both early and later learners of German. Group differences were seen in the absolute constraint weightings, however, with the bilinguals’ agreement preferences being more strongly influenced by number match with the containee phrase, indicating a comparatively greater reliance on surface-level cues to agreement (such as noun proximity) among the bilingual group.

Highlights

  • In subject–verb agreement marking languages such as German, binominal subjects sometimes allow for variable number agreement with the verb, which is illustrated by the examples in (1a–d) containing pseudo-partitive subjects

  • The analysis revealed a main effect of NP1, with NP1-match sentences rated significantly better than NP1-mismatch sentences across both groups

  • Note that reaction times (RTs) data may not be very informative, since the decision about verb number could in principle be made earlier during the presentation of the subject phrase, and when the question prompt appeared

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In subject–verb agreement marking languages such as German, binominal subjects sometimes allow for variable number agreement with the verb, which is illustrated by the examples in (1a–d) containing pseudo-partitive subjects. The Duden German reference grammar describes this kind (and other cases) of variable agreement as Zweifelsfälle (“cases of doubt”) (Hennig et al, 2016), acknowledging that subject–verb number agreement in pseudo-partitives is not determined by any categorical rules (see Jaeger, 1992; Wegerer, 2012). Focusing on binominal subjects with container nouns (as in 1d above), the present study asks to what extent German speakers accept (Experiment 1) and produce (Experiment 2) singular versus plural verbs in cases where there is a number conflict between NP1 and NP2. Note that in Turkish, no number conflicts exist in these structures, as is illustrated by the examples in (2)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call