Abstract

PurposeLow-grade (LG) urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (UCB) are common malignancies that are costly to surveil and rarely progress to life threatening, high-grade (HG) malignancies. It is unknown if the progression of LG to HG is a result of second primary tumors or transformation of existing LG tumors. We examined tumor genetics in patients with grade progression in urothelial carcinoma and compared to patients with no progression.ResultsFive patients were identified with progression. Median time from initial LG diagnosis to HG diagnosis in those experiencing progression was 19 months. Progression with both high and low mutational homology was identified. Gene alterations associated with tumor grade progression in initial low grade tumors include FBN3, CIT and HECTD4.Materials and MethodsAn institutional cancer database at a tertiary referral center in the United States identified patients who progressed from LG to HG UCB. Histologic re-review was performed by a genitourinary pathologist. Whole exome sequencing with correction for germline mutations by buffy coat subtraction was performed. Mutations were assessed between LG tumors and subsequent same-patient HG tumors and for LG patients who did not progress. Individual genes were assessed as potential predictors of risk for progression.ConclusionsTumor grade progression occurred with both high mutational homology and low mutational homology, which may represent both true tumor progression and de-novo growth. Validation of the identified tumor genes that appeared associated with progression may provide a clinically valuable tool to providers managing patients with LG urothelial carcinomas.

Highlights

  • Bladder cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the United States [1]

  • Gene alterations associated with tumor grade progression in initial low grade tumors include FBN3, CIT and HECTD4

  • Validation of the identified tumor genes that appeared associated with progression may provide a clinically valuable tool to providers managing patients with LG urothelial carcinomas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common malignancy in the United States [1]. In 2016, more than 76,000 new cases of bladder neoplasms were diagnosed in the United States [1]. Grade progression is a critical transition point in urothelial carcinomas, with true low grade malignancies having a very low metastatic potential while high grade tumors, even those progressing www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget from low grade, carry significant risk of morbidity and mortality [7]. This paradox of high recurrence and low risk of disease progression in initial low grade bladder tumors contributes to surveillance regimens that appear ineffective at identifying at-risk patients and at care costs that are among the highest on a per-patient basis [8]. Previous studies have examined urothelial carcinoma genetics in recurrence using earlier techniques or with an emphasis on multiple synchronous tumors [9,10,11]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.