Abstract

AbstractTo fully benefit from remotely sensed observations of the terrestrial water cycle, bias and random errors in these data sets need to be quantified. This paper presents a Bayesian hierarchical model that fuses monthly water balance data and estimates the corresponding data errors and error‐corrected water balance components (precipitation, evaporation, river discharge, and water storage). The model combines monthly basin‐scale water balance constraints with probabilistic data error models for each water balance variable. Each data error model includes parameters that are in turn treated as unknown random variables to reflect uncertainty in the errors. Errors in precipitation and evaporation data are parameterized as a function of multiple data sources, while errors in GRACE storage observations are described by a noisy sine wave model with parameters controlling the phase, amplitude, and randomness of the sine wave. Error parameters and water balance variables are estimated using a combination of Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and iterative smoothing. Application to semiarid river basins in Iran yields (a) significant reductions in evaporation uncertainty during water‐stressed summers, (b) basin‐specific timing and amplitude corrections of the GRACE water storage dynamics, and (c) posterior water balance estimates with average standard errors of 4–12 mm/month for water storage, 3.5–7 mm/month for precipitation, 2–6 mm/month for evaporation, and 0–2 mm/month for river discharge. The approach is readily extended to other data sets and other (gauged) basins around the world, possibly using customized data error models. The resulting error‐filtered and bias‐corrected water balance estimates can be used to evaluate hydrological models.

Highlights

  • The increasing availability and accuracy of remote sensing data of the terrestrial water cycle holds great promise for calibration and validation of large-scale hydrological models

  • The paper presents a probabilistic model to estimate monthly basin-scale precipitation, evaporation, terrestrial water storage, and river discharge based on independent observations of each water balance term and monthly water balance constraints

  • The model combines monthly basin-scale water balance constraints with data error models for each water balance variable that account for random and systematic data errors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increasing availability and accuracy of remote sensing data of the terrestrial water cycle holds great promise for calibration and validation of large-scale hydrological models. A challenge with using remotely sensed data for model evaluation is that data errors need to be properly accounted for. Without a reference “ground truth” data set, these errors are difficult to quantify, thereby undercutting the potential of remote sensing data for advancing large-scale hydrology. Ignoring or misrepresenting systematic data errors (bias) during calibration leads to biased parameter estimates and limits learning, especially when water balance data are hydrologically inconsistent, that is, they do not close the water balance. Proper characterization of random errors (noise) and information content of the data is important: underestimating or even ignoring data noise may lead to overfitting, while overestimating data noise limits learning by not fully exploiting the information content of the data

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.