Abstract
GPM Core Observatory satellite has been in operation since February, 2014. Before the GPM operation started, TRMM had observed the rain rate in tropical regions. GPM's KuPR is a successor of TRMM/PR, and both have the same design [1]. However, differences have been confirmed in their estimates for the same rainfall. Therefore, we focus on the retrieval method of rain rate, and compare the rain rate estimates by KuPR and PR. As a result of comparison, path-integrated attenuation (PIA), surface reference technique (SRT) and non-uniform beam filling (NUBF) are regarded as the factors of differences of the rain rate. Particularly, overestimation of PIA in KuPR is one of the most important factors of the differences of rain rate. On the other hand, rain rate is overestimated in KuPR when SRT is ignored. Therefore, the number of cases is needed to be increased, and it is necessary to improve the parameters of SRT and NUBF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
