Abstract
Malicious Android applications use clever techniques to hide their real intents from the user and avoid detection by security tools. They resort to code obfuscation and dynamic loading, or wait for special events on the system like reboot or WiFi activation. Therefore, promising approaches aim to locate, study and execute specific parts of Android applications in order to monitor for suspicious behavior. They rely on Control Flow Graphs (CFGs) to obtain execution paths towards sensitive codes. We claim here that these CFGs are incomplete because they do not take into consideration implicit control flow calls, i.e., those that occur when the Android framework calls a method implemented in the application space. This article proposes a practical tool, GPFinder, exposing execution paths towards any piece of code considered as suspicious. GPFinder takes the Android framework into account and considers explicit and implicit control flow calls to build CFGs. Using GPFinder, we give global characteristics of application CFGs by studying a dataset of 14,224 malware and 2,311 goodware samples. We evaluate that 72.69% of the analyzed malicious samples have at least one suspicious method reachable only through implicit calls.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.