Abstract
Ex-ante, interim and outcome evaluation approaches used at the program, center and project-level of analysis for four separate co-operative research center initiatives are examined. Center initiatives have received much evaluative scrutiny since 1980, particularly interim and outcome assessments. The modified peer-review technique has most use. The strengths and weaknesses of novel approaches and their applicability to more traditional research funding schemes are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
