Abstract
This paper tries to better explain the business cycle data in a small open economy. We consider two shocks generating the dynamics of the model, a domestic productivity shock, on the domestic productivity, and a government spending shock, generating positive correlations between savings and investment without overestimating or underestimating the pro-cyclical behaviors of the two as in Mendoza (1991). We use stationary cardinal utility functions (SCU) to make discount factor endogenous to the model. We also incorporate different capital adjustment cost in private and public sector to explain the counter-cyclical fluctuations of trade balance. In line with Mendoza (1991), we use post-war Canadian business cycle data as the target of our calibration. The results have been significantly improved in most of the moments among interested variables.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.