Government ownership of banks, political system transparency, and regulatory barriers to new firm entry

Abstract

Why do governments pursue regulatory reforms fostering entrepreneurship? In this paper, we examine the link between government ownership of banks, political regime transparency, and regulatory barriers to the entry of new industrial firms. We propose a signalling theory for the deregulation of entry. We argue that high levels of government ownership of banks and political system opacity erode the reputation of national economies in the eyes of international investors. To improve international perceptions of their business and investment climate, governments reduce regulatory barriers to new business entry. Deregulation of new firm entry signals an improved investment climate to foreign investors, and thereby substitutes for political system transparency. This signal is credible, valued by international investors, and easier to implement than alternative signals. Evidence drawn from an analysis of 93 developed and developing countries supports our propositions. Countries with high levels of state ownership of banks exhibit higher regulatory barriers to firm entry. However, this relationship attenuates and even reverses in extremely opaque political systems. Consistent with our argument that international perceptions are the key mechanisms underlying this conditional relationship, we also show that the moderating effect of political system opacity weakens among countries with high levels of government ownership of banks and FDI inflows. Our findings have important implications for the literature on state ownership of banks, the political economy of reform, and for our understanding of strategic signalling in international relations.