Abstract

Transboundary protected areas (TBPAs) have gained currency over the past decade because of their perceived (and highly disputed) effectiveness at achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. However, few studies have analysed how institutional structures influence cross-border coordination across a range of issues in a transboundary park. This study uses two TBPAs in southern Africa-the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park-to look at issues of international governance in transboundary conservation. The bottom-up institutional development in the Kgalagadi has allowed ground-level officials to learn how to work together to adapt and respond to the day-to-day challenges they confront. By contrast, local-level collaboration in the Great Limpopo has emerged slowly due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials. The central premise is that the institutional beginnings to the two TBPAs result in differing capacities for effective collaboration. Initial institutional design also creates path dependencies, which may be difficult to overcome later. These findings can help practitioners in designing more robust, long-enduring institutions to better achieve their goals in future transboundary conservation projects.

Highlights

  • Research shows the environmental dilemmas of today to be increasingly challenging and complex

  • This study examines the governance of transboundary parks, which are protected areas that span the international border of two or more countries and engage in some level of collaborative governance to better achieve ecological, economic, and political goals, as a means for exploring how parks created through a bottom‐up process possess different capacities for response to challenges than parks that emerge from the top down

  • This research draws upon previous work on institutional change and path dependency (Alchian 1950; Ostrom 1990)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research shows the environmental dilemmas of today to be increasingly challenging and complex. In one stream of research on governance, scientists drawing on concepts of polycentricity attempt to match the level of governance to the scale of the environmental dilemma in an effort to internalise externalities (Ostrom 1999; Lebel et al 2006). In this context, and throughout this article, governance refers to ordering relationships between people and groups of people through institutions (Ostrom 1994).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call