Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze and classify the best public organizations in terms of Good Public Governance Practices related to the Leadership Mechanism based on the assessment of governance carried out by the Federal Court of Accounts. Method: For this analysis, ranking and evaluation of public organizations regarding Governance, the Multicriteria Decision Support Method (MCDM) Parsimonious AHP (PAHP) was used. Results: The PAHP method was able to rank 378 public organizations that were audited by the TCU following a pre-established questionnaire by this Court of Accounts. Contributions: This work contributed to Scientific Research in the area of Operational Research applied to Public Administration, as it brought relevant issues to academia and society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
