Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security

Abstract

AbstractA growing number of scholars argue that the development of the common security and defence policy (CSDP) should be analysed as the institutionalization of a system of security governance. Although governance approaches carry the promise of a sophisticated, empirically grounded picture of CSDP, they have been criticized for their lack of attention to power. This is because governance approaches focus on institutional rules and ideas rather than the social structure that underpins them. To refine the notion of security governance, this article analyses co‐operation patterns through social network analysis. Confirming the governance image, it maps out a complex constellation of CSDP actors that features cross‐border and cross‐level ties between different national and EU policy actors. It is also found, however, that CSDP is dominated by a handful of traditional state actors – in particular, Brussels‐based national ambassadors – who retain strategic positions vis‐à‐vis weaker supranational and non‐state actors. These actors are not giving up on state power, but reconstituting it at the supranational level.