Abstract
The German speaking countries (Germany and Austria) have a strong tradition of universal health insurance since the late 19th century. Germany was one of the leading countries in “social hygiene as health science”, an interdisciplinary field of academic work, health policy and practice, providing a comprehensive scientific basis both for professional education and training in the new academies for social hygiene, the schools of public health in the 1920s, and also for a rapidly growing network of municipal public health services. Public health in Austria at that time was less advanced. There was a rupture in the field of public health in these countries as the Nazi regime and World War II destroyed almost all of the human resources, the scientific basis and the institutional infrastructure required for advancement.In the postwar period Germany was divided with separate social and health systems in East and West Germany until reunification in 1990. Meanwhile, Austria became a democratic federal republic developing a social welfare policy on the basis of a successful economy. Whereas Germany set up national programmes to support the development of a new public health, Austria established a health promotion fund. As a result, there has been more growth in the public health community in Germany than in Austria. However, in both countries strong efforts to strengthen the educational base will be needed to address the complex issues facing public health in the 21st century. For example, health expenditures in Germany and Austria are among the highest in the European Union, but health systems indicators such as healthy life years show values below the European average. The challenge to renew the highly fragmented systems of health/disease care and improve the social determinants of population health underline the need for strengthening public health structures and national policy in the two German speaking countries. Development of the scientific community is underway but has not yet reached the levels of the outstanding achievements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Highlights
At the end of the 19th and in the early 20th century, Germany was seen as one of the leading countries in the development of social hygiene, as well as of Bismarckian social health insurance
This review aims to explore the governance structures and activities in both countries
Health systems governance has developed in a pragmatic way in both Germany and Austria
Summary
At the end of the 19th and in the early 20th century, Germany was seen as one of the leading countries in the development of social hygiene, as well as of Bismarckian social health insurance During this time period, public health led to many scientific breakthroughs such as those of microbiologist Robert Koch, and the epidemiologist and highly influential civil servant Adolf Gottstein, making public health a cross-sectoral field.[1] Austrian public health followed a similar course, but was less advanced. Since the establishment of federal democratic states in 1949 and 1950 both countries have achieved high levels of economic growth, social security and standards of living They have established extensive and highly differentiated systems of health/disease care and health expenditures have risen to more than ten percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).[2] both countries lag behind in the development of public health governance as that in comparable European countries, Austria to an even greater extent than Germany. Contrasts and discusses capacity building efforts for a new public health in Germany and Austria, with recommendations to strengthen the public health infrastructure, including education of the public health workforce to meet the challenges of the 21st century
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.