Abstract

The entire nineteenth-century, especially the second half of it, was a period of cultural and religious ferment in India under the influence of western culture and missions. Believing that the civilization of India is barbaric and superstitious, the Colonisers think Western epistemological structure – culture, political ideology and philosophy, forms of government, educational and social infrastructure – are needed to be implied to civilize their colonies which according to them were inhabited by humanist subclasses. But the Missionaries had different missions. They bring along with them a new world of Christendom who intervene into the interests – livelihood, work, cultural practices, life style, food habit, social behaviour, social infrastructure – of the bulk of the rural population – landless labour, small and marginal farmers, artisans, nomads and various aboriginal without caring to understand the social peculiarities of the place; ignoring the religio-cultural sensitivity of people. Their moral superiority and doctrine of monopoly miserably fails to understand the social solidarity, social cohesion and social integration of the wretched of earth. Moreover, with their aggressive imperialism, the Christian missionaries are perpetrating in nature who can not recognise the dalit, marginalized, downtrodden and subaltern. And the indigenous people who is not a part or choose not to be a part of the course of Christianisation, fall victims to the seductive ideology of the missionaries. It is because their foundational principles and doctrines are alien, unreasonable and uncalled for and have been called into questions. They have been challenging and harmful to their sustainable living. In brief, the worst sufferers are the primitive people who live in isolation and are forgotten. Their liberty and equality and rights and justice are at stake. Those facilities are denied and gasping for breath. Needles to say, there has been a radical change in their ideas, value systems, beliefs, cultural practices and so on and so forth. And its abuses have been examined by writers from varied backgrounds. One of the first authors to address such issues in literary works is Gopinath Mohanty.

Highlights

  • In his portrayal of tribal life, Gopinath Mohanty invites comparison with the Nigerian novelist, Chinua Achebe

  • Mohanty could not be compared with Chinua Achebe in a complete sense but up to some extent

  • While Achebe belongs to the Ibo community and an insider wishing good for his own society, Mohanty is an outsider writing about tribal life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In his portrayal of tribal life, Gopinath Mohanty invites comparison with the Nigerian novelist, Chinua Achebe. This murder is a crime in the eyes of the law, but Gopinath Mohanty does not categorize to Sukru Jani and his sons He leaves it for the judgement, as the murder of Rama Chandra Bisoi is a kind of revolt against the exploitation caused by the local money lenders-landlords. Daughter of the patriarch Sarabu Saonta like Thenga Jani of Paraja, is betrothed to Harguna but she develops an intimacy with Besu Kandha and marries him without social rites In another act of violation of tribal codes, Diyudu, the son of Sarabu, is no more attracted to his wife Puyu as she has lost her youth, freshness and charm after giving birth to Hakina. Along with the rest of the government, is ousted by a coup

Conclusion
Works Cited
Contemporary Literary Review India
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.