Abstract

Platform monopoly has attracted wide attention from politicians and the public.. The European Commission has made unremitting efforts in platform antitrust enforcement in the last decade, but together with antitrust investigations, the stock prices of platform giants like Google and Facebook keep breaking their highest points. At the end of 2020, the Chinese government also started antitrust investigations towards platform companies like Alibaba. In contrast, the stock price of Alibaba crashed and lost more than half of its market value. By analyzing their CAR, we proved that the stock performance of Alibaba is significantly worse than Google after their most serious antitrust investigations. The difference reflects investors' different expectations of the European Commission and China's antitrust enforcement. A noteworthy problem then comes out: while the Chinese government is seriously strengthening platform antitrust and putting forward reforms in platform regulation, is there any authority that is able to effectively regulate the international platform giants and maximize the welfare of their users worldwide?

Highlights

  • Since the 21st century, platform economy has gradually attracted people’s attention

  • The Chinese government fined Alibaba 18.2 billion RMB in 2021/4, since the case is relatively new, we only find a limited number of works around Alibaba, but it’s obvious that the papers around Alibaba have an idea in common, that the case of Alibaba is only a beginning; the Chinese government is going to take serious actions in platform antitrust enforcement

  • We proved that the stock performance of Alibaba is much worse than Google after the antitrust investigations and huge fines

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Since the 21st century, platform economy has gradually attracted people’s attention. In a ranking list published by PwC in 2021, seven out of the ten biggest companies in the world are platform companies, including APPLE INC, the biggest company in the world, MICROSOFT, AMAZON, ALPHABET(Google) and META(Facebook), ranked from third to sixth, followed by two Chinese platform companies, TENCENT and ALIBABA. Since the end of 2020, the Chinese Administration for Market Regulation started antitrust investigations toward the platforms in China. After the European Commission’s investigations, especially after it fined Google €2.42 billion in 2017, there is a huge debate upon the rightfulness of antitrust penalty. After the Chinese administration’s punishment on Alibaba, most researchers recognize the case as a start of platform antitrust enforcement in China, and predict that more actions upon platform antitrust might follow. These differences indicate that the European Commission’s antitrust enforcement against international platform giants and the Chinese government’s antitrust enforcement against Chinese platforms are facing different situations. In Chinese academia, most scholars hold a positive attitude in strengthening platform antitrust enforcement and platform regulation, several reasons supporting this position are listed

LITERATURE REVIEW
Platform Economic Theories
Studies Around the Cases of Google and Alibaba During the
EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
Reasons Behind the Different Stock Performance
Obstacles in Regulating International Platforms Since 2010, the European
The Platform Antitrust Reform in China In contrast, the
Reasons that Platforms should be
Dual character of platforms There is a popular idea in
Platform service is quasi-public good Public good is a classic economic concept
Findings
Keep the platforms’ R&D in the right direction
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call