Abstract

It is well known that the tests based on the residual empirical process for fitting an error distribution in regression models are not asymptotically distribution free. One either uses a Monte-Carlo method or a bootstrap method to implement them. Another option is to base tests on the Khmaladze transformation of these processes because it renders them asymptotically distribution free. This note compares Monte-Carlo, naive bootstrap, and the smooth bootstrap methods of implementing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with the Khmaladze transformed test. We find that the transformed test outperforms the naive and smooth bootstrap methods in preserving the level. The note also includes a power comparison of these tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.