Abstract

The human connectome has become the very frequent subject of study of brain-scientists, psychologists and imaging experts in the last decade. With diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques, united with advanced data processing algorithms, today we are able to compute braingraphs with several hundred, anatomically identified nodes and thousands of edges, corresponding to the anatomical connections of the brain. The analysis of these graphs without refined mathematical tools is hopeless. These tools need to address the high error rate of the MRI processing workflow, and need to find structural causes or at least correlations of psychological properties and cerebral connections. Until now, structural connectomics was only rarely able of identifying such causes or correlations. In the present work we study the frequent neighbor sets of the most deeply investigated brain area, the hippocampus. By applying the Frequent Network Neighborhood mapping method, we identified frequent neighbor-sets of the hippocampus, which may influence numerous psychological parameters, including intelligence-related ones. We have found “Good Neighbor” sets, which correlate with better test results and also “Bad Neighbor” sets, which correlate with worse test results. Our study utilizes the braingraphs, computed from the imaging data of the Human Connectome Project’s 414 subjects, each with 463 anatomically identified nodes.

Highlights

  • The human connectome has become the very frequent subject of study of brain-scientists, psychologists and imaging experts in the last decade

  • The neuronal-level connectome, where the nodes correspond to the 80 billion neurons, and two nodes are connected by an edge if the corresponding neurons are connected by an axon, is unknown for us

  • One of the most reliable human magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets to date are the public releases of the Human Connectome Project (HCP)[11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human connectome has become the very frequent subject of study of brain-scientists, psychologists and imaging experts in the last decade. With diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques, united with advanced data processing algorithms, today we are able to compute braingraphs with several hundred, anatomically identified nodes and thousands of edges, corresponding to the anatomical connections of the brain The analysis of these graphs without refined mathematical tools is hopeless. With currently available techniques the human braingraph can be constructed and analyzed in a much coarser resolution than the neuronal level, with the help of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)[7] In these graphs, the nodes are anatomically identified 1−1.5 cm[2] areas of the gray matter (frequently addressed as “ROIs”, i.e., Regions Of Interests), and two nodes are connected by an edge if the diffusion MRI analyzing ­workflow[7,8,9,10] finds axonal fiber tracts between them. The parameter k is selectable, along with other parameters at the webserver https://pitgroup.org/connectome/, and the resulting consensus graph can be visualized and downloaded from the ­site[12,13]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call