Good mothers, bad mothers, and the nature of resistance to herbivory in Solidago altissima

Abstract

Evidence of poor correspondence between an insect herbivore's oviposition preferences and the performance of its offspring has generally been attributed either to maladaptive behavior of the insect mother or inadequate measurement by the researcher. In contrast, we hypothesize that many cases of "bad mothers" in herbivores may be a byproduct of the hierarchical way natural selection works on resistance in host plants. Epistatic selection on the components of resistance (i.e., antixenosis and antibiosis) may generate negative genetic correlations between the resistance components, which could counteract the efforts of herbivores to oviposit on the best hosts for the performance of their offspring. In common garden and greenhouse experiments, we measured aspects of antixenosis and antibiosis resistance in 26 genets of tall goldenrod, Solidago altissima, against two common herbivores: the gall-inducing fly Eurosta solidaginis and the spittlebug Philaenus spumarius. Goldenrod antixenosis and antibiosis were positively correlated against E. solidaginis and negatively correlated against P. spumarius. Analogously, population-wide preference-performance correlations were positive for the gall flies and negative for the spittlebugs. Several natural history differences between the two insects could make gall flies better mothers, including better synchrony of the phenologies of the flies and the host plant, the much narrower host range of the gall flies than the spittlebugs, and the more sedentary lifestyle of the gall fly larvae than the spittlebug nymphs. If these results are typical in nature, then negative genetic correlations in antixenosis and antibiosis in plants may often result in zero or negative population-wide correlations between preference and performance in herbivores, and thus may be an important reason why herbivorous insects often appear to be bad mothers.