Good glycaemic control: an international perspective on bridging the gap between theory and practice in type 2 diabetes

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Good glycaemic control is crucial in reducing the risk of diabetes-related complications. Despite the availability of evidence-based treatment guidelines, glycaemic control appears to remain suboptimal in most countries.Objectives: In this commentary we outline the extent to which diabetes guideline targets on HbA1c are being met in clinical practice and – where targets are being missed – to identify potential reasons for this shortfall. Furthermore, we discuss possible actions that may improve glycaemic control.Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE using 20 core terms was conducted to help assess the state of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes worldwide.Results: Despite clinical guidelines, evidence suggests that glycaemic control is suboptimal in most parts of the world, with average HbA1c values varying from 7.0% to 12.6% and thus above virtually all HbA1c recommendations. The potential reasons for this shortfall are numerous. However, lack of diabetes education and awareness of HbA1c appear to be particularly important. A number of education initiatives from around the world have been shown to improve HbA1c levels significantly and thus improve standards of care.Conclusions: Poor glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes appears to be a worldwide problem. As the global rise in diabetes (and its complications) seems destined to affect many less affluent countries, it is essential that appropriate steps are taken to address the barriers to good glycaemic control and ultimately improve outcomes for all people with type 2 diabetes.