Abstract
Preferential trade agreements (PTAs) trigger investment through their commitment to a liberal market economy. Increasingly however, PTAs go far beyond liberalizing trade and investment flows. Especially controversial features included in most modern PTAs are environmental and labor standards. Do these standards affect business activity? If so, how do investors react to such non-trade issues in trade deals? The literature provides inconclusive findings about the impact of standards on foreign direct investment (FDI). Some contributors argue that strict standards decrease FDI, whilst others claim that environmental and labor protection increases productivity and, in consequence, inward investment. In all likelihood, the usage of aggregated FDI data, as is the case for most studies, causes confusion. I expect standards to influence investors’ decisions – but heterogeneously across sectors. Environmental and labor standards should reduce FDI in polluting and low-skilled labor endowed industries, but increase investment in environmentally clean and high-skilled labor abundant sectors. Based on an original dataset of environmental and social standards in trade agreements and at the sector-level disaggregated US-FDI data, I find robust support for my argument. The paper provides a more nuanced picture on the standards and investment nexus: Standards have no uniform effect on multinationals. Instead, they are good for some, but bad for other industries.
Highlights
Preferential trade agreements (PTAs) trigger investment through their commitment to a liberal market economy
This is due to the reason that they rely on low production prices that potentially increase with stricter environment and labor standards
The statistical analysis shows that companies in these sectors tend to respond negatively to environmental protection (EP) issues in trade deals
Summary
Do higher standards attract or deter foreign investors? Several scholars investigated this question, but the answer remains ambiguous. Multinationals investing in a PTA partner state no longer depart from the legal context of environmental protection- and labor standards in the home country. This has potential effects on investor decisions: Some might benefit from unified standards; others could be worse off than in a situation of ruleasymmetries. Disaggregated FDI data is likely to advance our understanding of investors’ reactions to NTIs. I explain why investors are prone to care about standards in such treaties
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have