Abstract

Background:Previous studies have shown a high incidence of complications with a bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) guided-motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, which led to recent modifications of the design by the manufacturer.Objective:The current study was undertaken to assess whether the use of this TKA system with an extension-first surgical technique is associated with a similar rate of short-term adverse outcome as reported in literature.Material and Methods:This retrospective study enrolled 257 consecutive patients (257 knees) undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis of the knee, with the first 153 receiving cemented Journey BCS I implants and the remaining 104 receiving cemented Journey BCS II implants when these became available.Results:Mean follow-up time for the cohort was 24.5 ± 7.8 months (range, 12 - 36 months). There were no cases of stiffness. Incidence of iliotibial friction syndrome was considered low: three (2.0%) knees in the BCS I group and two (1.9%) in the BCS II group (p = 0.676). Five (2.5%) knees presented with mild instability in midflexion, three (2.0%) in the BCS I group and two (1.9%) in the BCS II group (p = 0.676). One patient with a BCS I implant required reoperation for aseptic loosening 23 months postoperatively. At one-year follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences in any of the clinical outcomes.Conclusion:When used in combination with an extension-first surgical technique, good early functional results with an acceptable rate of complications were obtained with both the original and the updated Journey BCS knee implant.

Highlights

  • Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), though primarily considered a successful procedure, has been associated with post-surgical functional deficits in activities of daily living [1, 2]

  • Five knees (1.9%) were observed mimicking iliotibial band (ITB) friction syndrome, three (2.0%) in the bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) I group and two (1.9%) in the BCS II group (p = 0.676)

  • In addition to ITB, we observed five knees (1.9%) with mild instability in midflexion, of which three (2.0%) were in the BCS I group and 2 (2.9%) were in the BCS II group (p = 0.676)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), though primarily considered a successful procedure, has been associated with post-surgical functional deficits in activities of daily living [1, 2]. Hommel and Wilke deficits, several new knee implants were introduced in recent years that seek to obtain improved stability and higher flexion One such implant (Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilized [BCS], Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) recreates a specific kinematic model through the principle of guided motion [3]. Guided motion is obtained via the asymmetric tibiofemoral surface geometry and cam-post design, the latter of which guides the femur to external rotation in flexion in relation to the tibia and in full extension to the screw-home mechanism The function of both the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament is replicated by the post-cam’s ability to engage posteriorly as well as anteriorly [5]. Previous studies have shown a high incidence of complications with a bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) guided-motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, which led to recent modifications of the design by the manufacturer

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.