Good coronary collateral circulation is not associated with better prognosis in patients with chronic total occlusion, regardless of treatment strategy

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effects of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) on the prognosis of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) under different treatment strategies. MethodsWe analyzed a total of 1124 patients who were diagnosed with CTO and divided them into groups with good CCC (grade 2 to 3, n = 539) or poor CCC (grade 0 to 1, n = 531). The primary outcome was cardiac death during follow-up; the secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We also performed subgroup analyses in groups with and without CTO revascularization (CTO-R and CTO-NR, respectively), and sensitivity analyses excluding patients who received failed CTO-PCI to further investigate the effect of CCC. ResultsDuring a median follow-up duration of 23 months, we did not detect any significant differences between the good CCC group and the poor CCC group in terms of cardiac death (4.2% vs 4.1%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–1.83; p = 0.970) and MACEs (23.6% vs 23.2%; adjusted HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84–1.37; p = 0.590). Subgroup analyses according to CTO revascularization showed similar results. In addition, we observed no differences in sensitivity analyses when patients who received failed CTO-PCI were excluded. ConclusionGood CCC was not associated with a lower risk of cardiac death or MACEs among patients with CTO, regardless of whether the patients received CTO revascularization treatment.