Abstract

Recently, structural models of psychopathology, that address the diagnostic stability and comorbidity issues of the traditional nosological approach, have dominated much of the psychopathology literature. Structural approaches have given rise to the p-factor, which is claimed to reflect an individual’s propensity toward all common psychopathological symptoms. Neurocognitive abilities are argued to be important to the development and maintenance of a wide range of disorders, and have been suggested as an important driver of the p-factor. However, recent evidence argues against p being an interpretable substantive construct, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from associations between p, the specific factors of a psychopathology model, and neurocognitive abilities. Here, we argue for the use of the S-1 bifactor approach, where the general factor is defined by neurocognitive abilities, to explore the association between neurocognitive performance and a wide range of psychopathological symptoms. We use simulation techniques to give examples of how S-1 bifactor models can be used to examine this relationship, and how the results can be interpreted.

Highlights

  • In recent years, there has been a body of research that has moved away from the study of any single disorder

  • On closer inspection, the intelligence quotient (IQ) general factor accounted for notably more variance amongst the internalising and thought disorder indicators when compared to the externalising indicators

  • We showed the utility of the S-1 bifactor approach to the study of neurocognitive abilities and psychopathology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been a body of research that has moved away from the study of any single disorder (see [1]). The p-factor has been claimed to reflect neuroticism [6], disordered thought [7], functional impairment [8], and impulsive responsivity to emotion [9]. Constructs, such as neurocognitive abilities, due to their reliable correlation with the general factor, have been claimed to be a key driver of the p-factor [1]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.