Abstract

BackgroundThe movement and spatial ecology of an animal depends on its morphological and functional adaptations to its environment. In fossorial animals, adaptations to the underground life help to face peculiar ecological challenges, very different from those of epigeal species, but may constrain their movement ability.MethodsWe made a long-term capture-recapture study of the strictly fossorial amphisbaenian reptile Trogonophis wiegmanni to analyze its long-term movement patterns. We also used passive integrated transponder (PIT) telemetry to detect and follow undisturbed individuals underground, obtaining data of their short-term movement patterns.ResultsAmphisbaenians showed a high site fidelity, moving short distances and over small areas, and spending some days without any noticeable movement, even under favorable conditions. We also found differences in movements between sexes and age classes.ConclusionsThis movement and spatial strategy can be related to the energetic constrains of underground burrowing, or to the low metabolic requirements of fossorial reptiles, as distances and areas covered were much smaller than for epigeal reptiles of similar size. Individual differences probably reflect differential reproductive and social requirements of males and females, and that younger individuals might show more floating behavior until they can settle in a territory. This study is a rare example describing the movement ecology of a fossorial species and may contribute to the general understanding of the factors that affect space use and movement decisions in animals.

Highlights

  • Animals do not move and use all the available space at random but following specific ecological patterns that determine the structure and dynamics of each species and the entire community [1, 2]

  • If we found a passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag, alone or inside the remains of a dead amphisbaenian, we discarded its data in this study

  • Long-term recaptures indicated that T. wiegmanni amphisbaenians showed high site fidelity with limited displacements, considering the distance that they move away from initial capture points Short-term movement patterns indicated short distances moved and small areas covered

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals do not move and use all the available space at random but following specific ecological patterns that determine the structure and dynamics of each species and the entire community [1, 2]. There may be ecological constraints, such as the density of conspecifics/heterospecifics, or other environmental factors (e.g. availability of optimal habitats, etc) These factors determine that some species or classes of individuals are more territorial or sedentary, showing high site fidelity to a small area, while others behave as floaters or nomadic, and move widely around large areas [10,11,12]. Juveniles may be more nomadic, dispersing over large areas before they settle as adults in a given territory [9, 13] For these reasons, it is important to study a broad picture, including microhabitat selection, movement patterns and home ranges, to understand what drives the animal movements and space use strategies [14, 15]. Adaptations to the underground life help to face peculiar ecological challenges, very different from those of epigeal species, but may constrain their movement ability

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call