Abstract
This paper examines two related research questions: (1) Does a firm’s innovation strategy affect its going public (vs. staying private) decision? (2) Does the change of ownership associated with going public influence a newly public firm’s subsequent innovation strategy? Using a dataset consisting of both private and newly public U.S. firms’ patent and financial data over the period 1997-2008, we find that private firms doing exploitative innovation are more likely to go public, and that once public, these firms pursue even more exploitative innovation. Importantly, we show that the positive relationship between going public and doing exploitative innovation is weakened if there is a higher proportion of dedicated institutional shareholding, a higher proportion of management shareholding, or a dual-class ownership structure in the newly public firm. We conclude that innovation strategy is an important antecedent to, and shaped by, the decision to go public. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.