Abstract
The ‘digital turn’ in archaeology has resulted in documentation, analysis, visualization and repository requirements becoming increasingly digital in recent years. However, we are only at the beginning of understanding how the shift from analogue to digital affects archaeological interpretation, as attention has mainly been directed towards technological aspects. However, how archaeology is executed influences the production of archaeological knowledge, and additional research into digital practices and their consequences is needed. During the latest excavation in 2014 of the Neolithic flint mines of Södra Sallerup, in Malmö in southern Sweden, several recording methods were used to document the remains in plan, including hand drawing, digital mapping with GPS and digital photography using a camera mounted on a pole. The records were used to create both a digital plan as well as georeferenced orthophotos from a 3D model and from photomosaic. The aim was to produce a record comparable to previous documentation from decades of archaeological excavations of the flint mines in the area, as well as one that is up-to-date with today’s digital standards. The methods are described and their consequences for the archaeological results are discussed.
Highlights
The introduction of digital tools into the archaeological toolkit has transformed, and is still transforming, archaeological practices, as technical development is in a phase of rapid change
The digital turn in archaeology has come to encompass all aspects of archaeological work, including recording, analysis, dissemination and storage of archaeological information, wherever digital tools are used in archaeology
To yet again rephrase the question asked by Huggett (2015): ‘what did we gain from the digital component of our documentation in this case?’ It can be concluded that the digital documentation proved most useful as a combination of digital plans and orthophotos, as it provided a new perspective on the remains that was available after the excavation, which influenced interpretations
Summary
The introduction of digital tools into the archaeological toolkit has transformed, and is still transforming, archaeological practices, as technical development is in a phase of rapid change This development and its impact on archaeology has been called a ‘digital turn’ (Costopoulos 2016) and has had a profound impact on archaeological work and archaeological information processes, altering the subject in ways we have hardly begun to imagine (Huvila 2014, 2018). The digital turn in archaeology has come to encompass all aspects of archaeological work, including recording, analysis, dissemination and storage of archaeological information, wherever digital tools are used in archaeology It started with data processing and statistical analyses as computers became common in the 1960s and 1970s (Zubrow 2006), continued with digital mapping with total stations during the 1990s, as well as the use of GIS software for analysis and visualization of the collected data, to the situation of rapid development today, which has been characterized as a ‘digital leap’, rather than a digital turn (Gunnarsson 2018). This is in essence a change of perspective that leads to the possibility of asking new questions and achieving new knowledge
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
