Abstract

Striking progress has been made on conceptual and methodological aspects linking species to community and ecosystem responses to environmental change. However, the first step when using a trait-based approach (i.e., choosing the adequate reflecting species response to a given environmental driver) deserves much more attention. The first broad comparative studies, using worldwide datasets, have identified a number of that are, for example, good indicators of plant responses to water and nutrient availability, or good indicators of plant species defense against herbivory and plant effects on litter decomposition. Due to the successful explanation of global patterns of trait variation and the relatively easy measurements, some functional have become widely used. However, it is starting to be questioned whether the status of such fashionable traits is always justified; especially considering that particular might be the result of underlying that respond to distinct environmental factors. Some global trade-offs between reflecting contrasting resource use strategies do not hold under changing environmental conditions. Therefore, the choice of to up-scale responses of individuals to communities and ecosystems should be based on their adequacy for a specified ecological context. Here, we present a framework that helps identifying objective criteria for the choice of functional for studies on community assembly and ecosystem processes and services. This framework comprises five steps: 1) identification of the main environmental drivers; 2) identification of the relevant physiological processes allowing species to cope with the environment; 3) selection of that are involved in such physiological processes; 4) validation of the select at community level and; 5) evaluation of possible consequences for ecosystem processes/services. © 2013 ABECO.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call