Abstract

By examining the systematic integration of theology, ethics, and teleology in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, I address four key interpretational aporiai: the apparently illogicality of the opening lines, the apparent contradiction between practical virtue and contemplation being the highest good, the dominant v. inclusivist views of eudaimonia, and the immanence v. transcendence of God. I show how proper attention to the link between Aristotle's conception of the Good as at which all things aim and God as the prime unmoved mover, as well as an appreciation of the overall aristocratic context of Aristotelian philosophy, provides a new way of dealing with these aporiai that renders them less perplexing and problematic, while avoiding un-Aristotelian, anachronistic readings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call