Abstract

Abstract Introduction Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (ERAS) are used in peri-operative care to reduce the stress response to surgical aggression. As fluid overload has been associated with increased morbidity and delayed hospital discharge, a major aspect of this is fluid management. Intra-operative goal-directed fluid protocols have been shown to reduce post-operative complications, particularly in high risk patients. Objective To compare 2 fluid therapy models (zero-balance versus goal-directed fluid therapy) in patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program, recording the rate of complications such as surgical site infection, ileus, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and variability of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Materials and methods An observational, retrospective study was conducted including adults who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program, and to investigate the postoperative complication rate. Results A total of 128 patients were included in this study; 43 (33.6%) in the zero-balance group and 85 (66.4%) in the goal-directed fluid therapy group. The total fluids administered was lower in the goal-directed fluid therapy group, as well as the incidence of post-operative complications (surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, and postoperative nausea and vomiting). No significant differences were found for length of stay, intra-operative urine output, and variability of the eGFR. Conclusion The results of this study show that by using a goal-directed fluid therapy algorithm, the total amount of fluids administered can be reduced, as well as obtaining a lower incidence of post-operative complications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call