Goal Attainment Scaling in Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Real-World Clinical Study Protocol.

Abstract

Introduction Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is characterized by persistent chronic burning pain. Because BMS shows various symptoms, levels of severity, and treatment outcomes, measuring recovery is difficult in this patient population. Goal attainment scaling (GAS),a flexible and responsive technique for assessing outcomes in complex interventions, assimilates the achievement of individual goals into a single standardized "goal attainment scale." To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study protocol to investigate the effectiveness of adopting GASin patients with BMS. Methods This study will involve two phases. In phase 1, the suitability of GAS for BMS will be examined in 30 patients. All practitioners will be trained to support patients in setting their clinical goals. In phase 2, all 155 patients with BMS will set two clinical goals emphasizingspecific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timed (SMART) goals at the initiation of psychopharmacotherapy for BMS. During the follow-up at weeks four, 8, 12, and 24, the GAS T-scores for each patient will be derived from the result of the individual goal attainment scores multiplied by goal weighting. Other clinical rating scales, including the visual analog scale (VAS), oral dysesthesia rating scale, pain catastrophizing scale, patient's global impression of change, and clinical global improvement will be assessed simultaneously with the assessment of goal attainment. The interactions between GAS T-scores and other clinical scales or clinical characteristics, including baseline age and sex, will be analyzed, followed by a discussion on the effectiveness of adopting the GAS for BMS. Results The information gleaned from phase 1 will help train practitioners and develop the use of GAS for BMS. In phase 2, analyzing the GAS T-score, a quantitative assessment, will accurately reveal patient outcomes and satisfaction. The effectiveness of using the GAS and some factors contributing to patient satisfaction will be revealed by analyzing the interaction between the T-score and other clinical scales. Conclusions In addition to revealing the usefulness of GAS for BMS, we believe this studywill prompt further investigations to clarify the factors contributing to patient satisfaction and shed light on a new treatment strategy that reinforces theprevious treatments for BMS.