Goal Attainment: A Clinically Meaningful Measure of Success of Botulinum Toxin-A Treatment for Lower Limb Spasticity in Ambulatory Patients

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate whether botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for lower limb spasticity leads to patient goal attainment and identify factors associated with positive goal attainment and to assess the effect of BoNT-A treatment on patients’ gait. DesignRetrospective cohort study between June 2014 and February 2019. SettingPublic outpatient spasticity clinic in a tertiary hospital. ParticipantsThirty patients (N=30; 50% female; average age, 50.5y) with lower limb spasticity of heterogenous etiologies (96.7% cerebral±spinal origin and 3.3% isolated spinal origin); 73.3% (N=22) of patients had previously received BoNT-A treatment. InterventionsBoNT-A injection to lower limb muscles. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was goal attainment measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) was used to assess spasticity. Gait was characterized by spatiotemporal parameters. ResultsFifty-six treatment episodes were analyzed and showed that BoNT-A treatment resulted in a significant reduction in spasticity (pretreatment MAS=3.18±0.73; posttreatment MAS=2.27±0.89; P<.001) with no associated change in gait parameters. Logistic regression revealed that most patients (74.1%) achieved all of their goals, with younger patients having a high likelihood of goal attainment regardless of their gait profile identified by latent profile analysis of the gait parameters. Patients considered to have a low functioning gait profile demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood of goal attainment than patients with the other gait profiles combined (odds ratio, 45.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1602.1; P=.036). Chronic spasticity and pretreatment severity of spasticity (MAS) and its reduction were not associated with likelihood of goal attainment. ConclusionsThe success and efficacy of BoNT-A treatment in improving patient perceived gait quality and reducing the negative symptoms of spasticity were best measured using Goal Attainment Scaling. The study emphasizes the importance of measuring patient goals as a clinical outcome. Gait parameters were most informative when used collectively to classify patients based on their overall gait profile, which assisted in identifying differences between patients’ likelihood of goal attainment after treatment.