Abstract

Go/no-go execution decisions are one of the most important strategic decisions for owners during the early stages of construction projects. Restructuring the process of decision-making during these early stages may have sustainable results in the long run. The purpose of this paper is to establish proper go/no-go decision-tree models for owners. The decision-tree models were developed using Exhaustive Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (Exhaustive CHAID) and Quick, Unbiased, Efficient Statistical Tree (QUEST) algorithms. Twenty-three go/no-go key factors were collected through an extensive literature review. These factors were divided into four main risk categories: organizational, project/technical, legal, and financial/economic. In a questionnaire distributed among the construction professionals, the go/no-go variables were asked to be ranked according to their perceived significance. Split-sample validation was applied for testing and measuring the accuracy of the Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST models. Moreover, Spearman’s rank correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were employed to identify the statistical features of the 100 responses received. The result of this study benchmarks the current assessment models and develops a simple and user-friendly decision model for owners. The model is expected to evaluate anticipated risk factors in the project and reduce the level of uncertainty. The Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST models are validated by a case study. This paper contributes to the current body of knowledge by identifying the factors that have the biggest effect on an owner’s decision and introducing Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST decision-tree models for go/no-go decisions for the first time, to the best of the authors’ knowledge. From the “sustainability” viewpoint, this study is significant since the decisions of the owner, based on a rigorous model, will yield sustainable and efficient projects.

Highlights

  • The nature of each construction project is unique and dynamic as it involves numerous operations with multiple intricacies and various techniques that are used throughout one single project

  • CHAID and QUEST models are validated by a case study

  • This paper contributes to the current body of knowledge by identifying the factors that have the biggest effect on an owner’s decision and introducing Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST decision-tree models for go/no-go decisions for the first time, to the best of the authors’ knowledge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The nature of each construction project is unique and dynamic as it involves numerous operations with multiple intricacies and various techniques that are used throughout one single project. Construction projects encompass various risks, and it is essential to evaluate and manage those risks to guarantee the success of a project or firm [1]. Ref [2] stated that the construction industry has a poor reputation in risk classification and analysis compared to other industries. Many variables and complex relationships that exist in construction projects make the execution of a decision complicated. There are several kinds of risk decisions in construction projects, starting with the concept phase, continuing with the planning and execution phases, and ending with the completion phase. Various stakeholders (owners, CMs (construction management firms), contractors, consultants, suppliers) are involved in the uncertain and complex

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call