Abstract

The low reproducibility of differential expression of individual genes in microarray experiments has led to the suggestion that experiments be analyzed in terms of gene characteristics, such as GO categories or pathways, in order to enhance the robustness of the results. An implicit assumption of this approach is that the different experiments in effect randomly sample the genes participating in an active process. We argue that by the same rationale it is possible to perform this higher-level analysis on the aggregation of genes that are differentially-expressed in different expression-based studies, even if the experiments used different platforms. The aggregation increases the reliability of the results, it has the potential for uncovering signals that are liable to escape detection in the individual experiments, and it enables a more thorough mining of the ever more plentiful microarray data. We present here a proof-of-concept study of these ideas, using ten studies describing the changes in expression profiles of human host genes in response to infection by Retroviridae or Herpesviridae viral families. We supply a tool (accessible at www.cs.bgu.ac.il/∼waytogo) which enables the user to learn about genes and processes of interest in this study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call