Go Ahead, Please!—Evaluation of External Human—Machine Interfaces in a Real-World Crossing Scenario

Abstract

In the future, automated vehicles (AVs) without a human driver will potentially have to manage communication with vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, in everyday traffic interaction situations. The aim of this work is to investigate pedestrian reactions to external communication concepts in a controlled, but real-world crossing scenario. The focus is to investigate which properties of external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) promote the comprehensibility of vehicle intention (yielding for the pedestrian) and therefore lead to faster and, at the same time, safer crossing decisions of pedestrians. For this purpose, three different eHMI concepts (intention-based light-band, perception-based light-band, and the combination of light-band and signal lamp) were examined and compared to a baseline (no eHMI). In a Wizard-of-Oz experiment, participants (n = 30) encountered a test vehicle equipped with the eHMIs in a real-world crossing scenario. The crossing initiation time in seconds and the participant's intention recognition were measured. Furthermore, the influence of the eHMIs on acceptance and perceived safety was evaluated. It was shown that the presence of the intention-based light-band, and the combination of light-band and signal lamp led to an earlier crossing decision compared to baseline with no eHMI. In summary, the results indicate that the intention-based light-band has a positive effect on the comprehensibility of the vehicle's intention. All concepts were evaluated positively regarding acceptance and perceived safety, and did not differ significantly from each other.